Ãëàâíàÿ    Ex Libris    Êíèãè    Æóðíàëû    Ñòàòüè    Ñåðèè    Êàòàëîã    Wanted    Çàãðóçêà    ÕóäËèò    Ñïðàâêà    Ïîèñê ïî èíäåêñàì    Ïîèñê    Ôîðóì   
blank
Àâòîðèçàöèÿ

       
blank
Ïîèñê ïî óêàçàòåëÿì

blank
blank
blank
Êðàñîòà
blank
Reinhart T. — Anaphora and semantic interpretation
Reinhart T. — Anaphora and semantic interpretation



Îáñóäèòå êíèãó íà íàó÷íîì ôîðóìå



Íàøëè îïå÷àòêó?
Âûäåëèòå åå ìûøêîé è íàæìèòå Ctrl+Enter


Íàçâàíèå: Anaphora and semantic interpretation

Àâòîð: Reinhart T.

Àííîòàöèÿ:

This book has two major goals: the first is a comprehensive analysis of sentence-level anaphora that addresses the questions posed above, and the second is an examination of the broader issue of the relations between the structural properties of sentences and their semantic interpretation within the hypotheses of the autonomy of syntax and of interpretative semantics developed by Chomsky. I argue that the anaphora restrictions themselves obey more general syntactic conditions on all interpretative rules, and, in fact, on all sentence-level linguistic rules. If this is so, these conditions may reflect properties of the processing ability of the mind, and I conclude, in Chapter 10, with the question to what extent we may find correlations between these conditions and the actual processing of sentences.


ßçûê: en

Ðóáðèêà: Ôèëîëîãèÿ/

Ñòàòóñ ïðåäìåòíîãî óêàçàòåëÿ: Ãîòîâ óêàçàòåëü ñ íîìåðàìè ñòðàíèö

ed2k: ed2k stats

Ãîä èçäàíèÿ: 1983

Êîëè÷åñòâî ñòðàíèö: 223

Äîáàâëåíà â êàòàëîã: 08.12.2005

Îïåðàöèè: Ïîëîæèòü íà ïîëêó | Ñêîïèðîâàòü ññûëêó äëÿ ôîðóìà | Ñêîïèðîâàòü ID
blank
Ïðåäìåòíûé óêàçàòåëü
Abrahamson      209
Akmajian      80
Anaphor      31 56n 2 139
Anaphora      see “Vound anaphora coreference”
Antecedent      31 56
Aoun      25
Argument position      139
BACH      108—109 111 133 134 148 170 173 177 180 187
Banfield      69 92
Bartsch      65
Bever      208—209 213 215
Bickeiton      41 59 79 96
Bolinger      55 96 110 168
Bosch      133n 3
Bound anaphora      112—133 146—172
Bound anaphora, and coreference      163—170
Bound anaphora, c-command restriction on      122
Bound anaphora, condition on      137
Bound anaphora, definition      115 139
Bound anaphora, translation procedure for      159—160
c-command, comparison with command      19—21
c-command, comparison with precede and command      14—22 34—56 119—131
Carden      38 53 119 129
Chapin      209
Chomsky      19 23—26 29 33 39 43 57 84 92 95—96 114—115 117 132—133 136—141 144 146 158 161 165 172 202 215
Clements      27 note1
Coindexing procedure      29—30 137—140 157—159 coreference”)
Coindexing procedure, output condition for      122 160—162
Coindexing rule      147
Command      13—14 40
Command, comparison with c-command      19—21
Communicative dynamism (CD)      98—100 199
Compositionality      111 note 7 183
Comrie      121—122 133
Constituent command      see “c-command”
Contra-indexing      138 144—146
Cooper, R.      65
Cooper, W.      216 note 6
Coreference      30—3
Coreference and bound anaphora      163—170
Coreference and rule ordering      35—36
Coreference and semantic interpretation      144—157
Coreference rule      16 30—32 42—43 136
Coreference rule for R-pronouns      133 136 157
Coreference, restrictions on      see “Coreference rule”
Culicover      19 27
Cushing      21
D-head      23
Danly      216 note 6
Derived VP-rule (DVPR)      151—152
Dik      76
Disjoint reference      29—33 (see also “Non-coreference”)
Disjoint reference, rule      33 136
Domain conditions, and processing strategies      208—215
Domain conditions, and syntactic rules      202—207
Domain conditions, general      25—26 41—42 181 202
Domain conditions, primacy      26 42 181 202
Domain head      see “D-head”
Domain restrictions      see “Domain conditions”
Dowty      111 note 8 135 166 174
Emonds      50 58 13 60 68
Engdahl      166
Erteschick — Shir      38
Evans      133 note 5 145 149 157 168 170 172
Faltz      109 160 186 197 201
Faraci      88 note 1 126
Fiengo      174 note 13
Firbas      98 199
Fodor      169 208—209 213
Frazier      216 note 5 8
Freidin      146 172
Full definition      23 41
Full definition and sisterhood      19 186—188
Full definition as a syntactic domain      19—23 41
Full definition, simplified definition      18
Function-argument representation      184
Functional principle      106
Gabbai      117 195
Garett      208 213
Geach      116
Goodluck      214
Governor      138—139
Gueron      170
Gundel      76 93 199
Hawkins      115
Heny      88 note 3 89
Higginbotham      117 130 134 146 172 174 178—179
Hinds      41 95—96 110
Hornstein      176
In construction with      13 18—19
Ioup      64—65 71 194—195
Jackendoff      13—15 35 56 63 68 80 88 90 91
Johnson      111 note 5
Kaburaki      57 note 7
Kamp      117
Karttunen      116
Kasher      117—166
Keenan      26 47 106—109 121—122 133 150 160 186 194 197 201
Kimball      209 212 215
Klima      18—19
Koster      170
Kuno      38 41 56 57 9 61 65 68 70 76 88 89 7
Lakoff      31 34—39 80 89 10 200
Langacker      13—14 26 28 30 37
Lapin      38
Lasnik      14 24 29—32 56 57 119 136 141—146 157 170 172 2 215
Liberman      58 note 15
May      147 197
McCray      55 170
Minimal governing category (MGC)      139
Mittwoch      55
Montague      33 160
Moravcsik      195
Non-coreference      29—33 142—146
Partee      108—109 111 116—117 133 134 149—151 156—157 170 172 173 177 180
Perlmutter      101 111
Postal      35 82 89nl0 101 111 114—117 121—122
Precede and command      13—14
Precede and command as a syntactic domain      14—18
Precede and command, and processing      209—211
Precede and command, comparison with c-command      14—22 34—56 119—131
Preferred reference condition      121—122
Primacy      see “Prominence”
Prominence      26
Pronominal NPs      26
Pronoun rule      151—152
Reihhart      18 23 27 56 57 77 79 90 110 115 130 133 134 10 11 135 136 141 143 146 170 179 181 197 201 202 214
Rosenbaum      48
Ross      26 28 61—62 89 119 134 9 151 180
Sag      150—151 178
Sloppy identity      150—156
smith      209
Solan      214
Sportich      25
Stalnaker      89 note 6
Superiority      19 40
Syntactic domains      13—18
Theme-rheme      59 94—101 198—200
Thomason      89 note 6
van Riemsdijk      69 84—5 89
Vennemann      65
VP-deletion      151—156
Wasow      35 39—40 59 80 113—116 121
Weak crossover      113
Weinberg      176
Williams      49—50 58 60 75 88 126 150—151 176 182
Zwartz      69 84—85 89
blank
Ðåêëàìà
blank
blank
HR
@Mail.ru
       © Ýëåêòðîííàÿ áèáëèîòåêà ïîïå÷èòåëüñêîãî ñîâåòà ìåõìàòà ÌÃÓ, 2004-2024
Ýëåêòðîííàÿ áèáëèîòåêà ìåõìàòà ÌÃÓ | Valid HTML 4.01! | Valid CSS! Î ïðîåêòå