The book in your hands shows Kant to be wrong. It articulates
and defends the zero-force evolutionary law, evolution’s
analog to Newton’s first law, the law of inertia.
We did not set out to write a book refuting Kant. Kant
has been shown wrong on so many points that such a task
would not have motivated us. Nor do we wish to compare
ourselves to the incomparable Newton, for we fear that
there is some chance that we might come up on the short
end of that comparison. Finally, neither of us suffers from
physics envy (at least according to our friends and families).
So what explains this book?