We dedicate our book to the memory of John Bell, perhaps the leading quantum theorist of the latter half of the twentieth century. His writings, lectures.
Is it not good to know what follows from what, even if it is not necessary FAPP? [FAPP is Bed's suggested abbreviation oj "for all praictical purposes". Suppose for example that quantum mechanics were found to resist precise formulation. Suppose that when formulation beyond FAPP is attempted, we find an immovable finger obsiinatch pointing outside the subject, to the mind of the observer, to the Hindu scriptures, to God, or even only Gravitation? Would that not be very, very interesting?